Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AOC Faces Ethics Questions After Reports Show Her Chief of Staff '''
IJR ^ | February 20, 2019 | Madison Dibble

Posted on 02/20/2019 1:15:16 PM PST by COUNTrecount

AOC Faces Ethics Questions After Reports Show Her Chief of Staff Cut Checks to Her Boyfriend Using a PAC

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) may have had her current chief of staff pay her boyfriend using campaign PAC money, according to a report from Luke Thompson, a National Review contributor.

Thompson started down the trail of analyzing Ocasio-Cortez’s professional relationship with her boyfriend, Riley Roberts, after realizing that the congresswoman had Roberts listed as a staff member with his own house.gov email account.

While you were having a nice Valentine's Day, @AOC decided to put her boyfriend on staff – drawing a salary on the taxpayer's dime. Nice to see her adapting to the swamp so quickly. pic.twitter.com/bvncwzxY53

— Luke Thompson (@ltthompso) February 15, 2019

As the tweet got more traction, Ocasio-Cortez responded, claiming that it was totally normal for members of the House to give their spouse — or in this case, significant other — an email address so they can see the member’s calendar.

Actually this cal designation is a permission so he can have access to my Google Cal. Congressional spouses get Gcal access all the time.

Next time check your facts before you tweet nonsense.

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) February 15, 2019

It didn’t take long for Ocasio-Cortez’s chief of staff, Saikat Chakrabarti, to hop online to defend his boss. He tweeted to Thompson that Roberts doesn’t work for the office in any capacity and is not paid. The email account, according to Chakrabarti, is purely for logistical access.

He's not paid. We have no volunteers in the office. He's not doing any government work. He can see her calendar just like spouses/partners/family members in other congressional office. Check your damn facts before you report bullshit. Lazy journos need to learn to do their jobs.

— Saikat Chakrabarti (@saikatc) February 15, 2019

The next day, Thompson took a screenshot that shows Roberts listed as “staff” for Ocasio-Cortez despite their claims otherwise.

It also didn’t take long for Hill staffers — like Jordan Haverly, a communications director for Rep. John Shimkus (R-Ill.) — to pull screenshots from the House IT guidelines showing that spouses, or boyfriends, are not supposed to have official house.gov email accounts.

Just going to leave this here. From the Committee on House Administration's IT policy. pic.twitter.com/Kd75nF17pT

— Jordan Haverly (@jhaverly) February 15, 2019

Fast-forward to Wednesday morning, and Thompson’s quest to find out if Roberts was officially hired by Ocasio-Cortez led him to another potential ethics violation by the Ocasio-Cortez team.

Thompson claims that Ocasio-Cortez worked with her current chief of staff, Chakrabarti, to make two payments totaling $6,000 to Roberts using campaign money from a PAC run by Chakrabarti.

Last week, @AOC and her Chief of Staff @saikatc (the rich guy in question) freaked out on me when I pointed out it looked like she'd hired her boyfriend. I did some digging in the FEC. Turns out Saikat has "hired" her boyfriend, before…just not to do any actual work.

— Luke Thompson (@ltthompso) February 20, 2019

Chakrabarti ran a campaign strategy firm called Brand New Congress, LLC. Under that firm, he had a PAC that he used for the campaigns he assisted. Three payments listed on FEC forms caught the eye of Thompson.

The first payment was from Brand New Congress PAC to Roberts for $3,000. Prior to Ocasio-Cortez’s election, Roberts worked in web design, yet he was paid by Brand New Congress for marketing.

Skip ahead 18 days from the original payment made to Roberts, and Ocasio-Cortez cut a check to Brand New Congress, LLC for $6,191.32.

A month later, Brand New Congress PAC cut another check to Roberts for $3,000. So, in total, Chakrabarti received $6,191.32 from Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign, and within two months, Roberts received $6,000 from Chakrabarti for his work as a “marketing consultant.”

The payments to Roberts are the largest payments made by @BrandNew535 to any person or group other than Brand New Congress LLC. Oh, and Roberts doesn't work in marketing. pic.twitter.com/XN8AYl0l7J

— Luke Thompson (@ltthompso) February 20, 2019

Thompson also noted that it appears they attempted to distance Roberts’ work with the campaign from the additional payments from Chakrabarti’s PAC by listing him under a different address in Arizona.

Roberts lists his residence as Arizona, where he's from, for the purposes of the disbursement, but for the in-kind work in 2018 and his cash donations to @AOC's campaign, he lists New York. Looks like a sad attempt to be sneaky. pic.twitter.com/lNAzmm4svP

— Luke Thompson (@ltthompso) February 20, 2019

Thompson also alluded that Chakrabarti got his job in Ocasio-Cortez’s office because of the transaction.

“A rich guy used a PAC to pay [Ocasio-Cortez’s] boyfriend $6,000 when her campaign was running out of money. After AOC won, she gave that rich guy a job in her office,” he tweeted.

Chakrabarti has political success in his own right from managing Brand New Congress and his work with Justice Democrats, so his qualifications seem to go beyond a simple tit-for-tat situation, but Thompson thinks Chakrabarti did more than just hire Roberts.

In his Medium post, Thompson points to the amount of debt racked up by Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign as leverage that could have been used by Chakrabarti, writing:

By the end of 2017 she’d spent $37,249.94 but raised only $8,361.03. That’s a lot of money to stick on a credit card. Since no loans are recorded on her campaign books, presumably either AOC or Roberts was fronting the necessary cash.

It looks to me like Chakrabarti was effectively reimbursing AOC for a third of her expenses with Brand New Congress LLC, perhaps so that she would stay in the race despite her mounting debt.

While both Ocasio-Cortez and Chakrabarti were quick to respond to Thompson’s report about Roberts’ house.gov email, they haven’t responded to his tweets about the payments to Roberts.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: aoc; cenkuygur; davidkoller; saikatchakrabarti; subhaschandrabose
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: COBOL2Java
Billboard in NYC today.


41 posted on 02/20/2019 1:53:37 PM PST by COUNTrecount (If only Harvey Weinstein's bathrobe could talk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

boyfriend? wow thats funny
seriesly, I was mistaken ..


42 posted on 02/20/2019 1:58:49 PM PST by ßuddaßudd ((>> M A G A << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

A month later, Brand New Congress PAC cut another check to Roberts for $3,000. So, in total, Chakrabarti received $6,191.32 from Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign, and within two months, Roberts received $6,000 from Chakrabarti for his work as a “marketing consultant.”

- -

I hear AOC has a degree in economics. I wonder what semester she took money laundering 101?


43 posted on 02/20/2019 2:00:11 PM PST by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: treetopsandroofs

The house.gov email address is a status symbol and monetizable asset since it implies access to Congress.


44 posted on 02/20/2019 2:04:08 PM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Her defense will probably be “it may not be legally right, but it’s morally right”.


45 posted on 02/20/2019 2:04:11 PM PST by robel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

The most unflattering picture of the equine socialist
I have yet to see.


46 posted on 02/20/2019 2:07:57 PM PST by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

They will turn on her for the Amazon screw up. I don’t think this would have come out if she didn’t mess that up.
Billions of dollars. 25k jobs. So much in kickbacks, no show jobs, union dues, construction contracts, waste management contracts, parking, etc. down the drain.
She’s got some heavy weights ticked at her.
I love it.


47 posted on 02/20/2019 2:10:15 PM PST by Palio di Siena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster

If anyone in Congress ever retired poor,
I’d love to hear about it.


48 posted on 02/20/2019 2:14:09 PM PST by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Palio di Siena

Boxcar Barbie the Bilious Bug-eyed Brain-dead Bribing Bolshevik Bitch.


49 posted on 02/20/2019 2:16:50 PM PST by JusPasenThru (Progressives need to get over their love affair with abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
Answer is $ 6,000.00

What is "How much does it cost to buy a stupid freshman Congress person Alex."

50 posted on 02/20/2019 2:17:16 PM PST by IC Ken (Stop making stupid people famous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Occasional Cotex, you think you’re privileged,eh?


51 posted on 02/20/2019 2:17:42 PM PST by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leep

ROFL


52 posted on 02/20/2019 2:20:01 PM PST by mykroar (Congratulations President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster

Let’s just hope this evil, conniving, stupid bitch is retired within two years. I suspect she’ll be with us until the United States devolves into Venezuela.


53 posted on 02/20/2019 2:21:25 PM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Buttons12

“She could always plead ignorance.”

No need. Its already assumed.


54 posted on 02/20/2019 2:21:35 PM PST by LeoTDB69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

“The house.gov email address is a status symbol and monetizable asset since it implies access to Congress.”

LOL. I can see it now.

your-ad-here@house.gov


55 posted on 02/20/2019 2:26:00 PM PST by LeoTDB69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Has anybody actually seen her recently or is she just tweeting?


56 posted on 02/20/2019 2:30:42 PM PST by seawolf101 (Member LES DEPLORABLES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

BTTT!


57 posted on 02/20/2019 2:36:18 PM PST by Pagey (8 years of MISERY, Thanks to Valerie Jarrett. Wretched human.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Don’t forget, the LIBERALS are in charge of Congress so it must be assumed the LIBERALS are completely in agreement to purging her.

NOW it is up to the R’s to DEFEND HER, but not so much as to make it really recognizable especially since the Rs will damn an R for ‘leaving the seat up’ etc.

AOC is the main jewel in the R camp...need to keep her around for the value she gives ‘us’ until the LIBs oust her.

Any truth to the ‘rumor’(that I am making up) that PDJT funded her candidacy? After he is from Queens and she represents a portion of Queens County...


58 posted on 02/20/2019 2:38:11 PM PST by xrmusn (6/98"Getting rich as a Politician means doing something illegal''(trunc) HS Truman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

The Green Old Deal is SOP for all socialists.


59 posted on 02/20/2019 2:42:28 PM PST by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

She sure learned the dark side of being a Dem in hurry.


60 posted on 02/20/2019 2:42:46 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson