Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Redwood71
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO...she is a citizen, but NOT a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN; there is a difference!
123 posted on 01/30/2019 9:16:32 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]


To: nopardons

According to the law School at Cornell University, a natural-born citizen refers to someone who was a U.S. citizen at birth, and did not need to go through a naturalization proceeding later in life.

The phrase “natural-born citizen” appears in the U.S. Constitution. In order to become the President or Vice President of the United States, a person must be a natural-born citizen. This “Natural-Born Citizen Clause” is located in Section 1 of Article 2 of the United States Constitution.

The constitution does not expressly define “natural born” nor has the Supreme Court ever ruled precisely upon its meaning. One can be a citizen while not being a “natural born” citizen if, for example, that person gained citizenship through the process of naturalization.

Under the 14th Amendment’s Naturalization Clause and the Supreme Court case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 US. 649, anyone born on U.S. soil and subject to its jurisdiction is a natural born citizen, regardless of parental citizenship. This type of citizenship is referred to as birthright citizenship.

Today, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 defines naturalization as “conferring of nationality of a state upon a person after birth, by any means whatsoever.” In contrast, § 1401 lists eight categories of peoples who are “nationals and citizens of the United States at birth,” including those born in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction, as well as children of one or more U.S. citizens abroad as long as the parent(s) meet certain requirements. This means that foreign-born citizens falling under a provision in 1401 are, by statutory definition, not naturalized. The term “natural born” is not used, however.

Without a definition from the Supreme Court, and their defining the semantics, there is no real definition of natural born and can be interpreted as starting from the parents to the child after birth, and not prior to birth since the parents are not US citizens which can be interpreted as a naturalizing process. Thus the debate goes on about the president’s position, but not about the legality of being a citizen.

rwood


145 posted on 01/31/2019 7:37:30 AM PST by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson