Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain

Changing Canada’s gun laws is not a trade deal, it is a legislative function.

I suppose Trump could ask Trudeau to push an initiative through Canada’s Parliament, but given their current atmosphere of wanting to enact even stricter gun control laws, I wouldn’t hold much hope.

The old system of declaring firearms at the border and again when leaving Canada seemed to work just fine, and there are a lot of people who move to and from Alaska every year that would like to move their household goods through Canada.

I’m not sure why Canada felt the need to change that law in 2001.


5 posted on 11/30/2018 7:51:31 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo; marktwain

.
>> “Changing Canada’s gun laws is not a trade deal...” <<

Wrong!

It is exactly a trade deal! (accomplished in the exact same fashion)
.


7 posted on 11/30/2018 7:54:25 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo
I’m not sure why Canada felt the need to change that law in 2001.

You know better.

The border controls were not changed for any legitimate purpose.

It was to punish gun owners and show how much the Leftists in Canada hate guns.

This was all about virtue signaling.

If you are a Leftist, punishing people you disagree with is a legitimate purpose.

9 posted on 11/30/2018 8:16:52 AM PST by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson