Judge did not rule against the President or his rights. The stupid lawyers representing the White House case to the judge made a serious mistake.
Basically the judge hasn’t determined whether a President has the right to revoke a press pass to attend the briefings. He is allowing Acosta back in because the lawyers could not even tell the Judge who made the decision to ban Acosta. That there is a process in place to follow and the White House did not follow the process to revoke the Hard Pass.
The judge does appear on our side believe it or not. He clearly stated that he does not agree with CNN lawyers on several points and said he doesn’t care if Acosta is never called on. And if the White House wants to ban Acosta again they need to simply follow the procedure for revoking a Hard Pass (whatever that is).
A little research is everyone friend.
“He [the jugde] is allowing Acosta back in....”
Your use of the word “allowing” presumes this judge has the final word. That remains to be seen. It is not clear whether this opinion is binding on the White House. Even if it is a court order, which it seems not to be, it would be subject to appeal.
“A little research is everyone friend.”
A bit condescending, and patience is also our friend.
Let’s see how this plays out. I say this is a PR stunt by CNN and the only way Acosta gets his pass back is if the President wants to give it back.
Why would POTUS want to do that? Well, Acosta publicly humiliated himself and embarrassed CNN with his rude and atrocious behavior.
Trump is known for handing people rope...