“throw away the Constitution”
I don’t look at it that way. If someone close to the situation reports a person that is performing actions that place him in question as to the safety of use of a weapon, and it can be accomplished that until it is determined if he is dangerous to someone else, his access is postponed, then I agree with it.
Not everyone should be allowed to own a gun. Nor a car, or access to pyrotechnics, or work with children in a one on one situation......the list is endless with environments that if observed, can be dangerous. Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should. And if it can be corrected, then all the better. And if they are wrong, and did it on purpose, they should pay for their actions. But if they are right, then a tragedy may be averted. And it isn’t permanent if they are wrong.
rwood
Obviously. And just as obviously, you hold the Constitution, and the very concept of limited government, in contempt.
Not everyone should be allowed to own a gun. Nor a car, or access to pyrotechnics, or work with children in a one on one situation.
Wow ... that's a quite remarkable list powers you want to unconstitutionally grant to Big Daddy Government. We've seen where that ends up ... the bloody XX Century provides entirely too many examples.