Peter Strzok is a sociopath

The Strzok hearings were a circus Thursday. They were a circus because democrats made them into a circus. Any and every time a question zeroed in on the target they interrupted with spurious and specious comments. Despite that, much was learned. The most important thing to come out?

Here are some of the exchanges that just blew me away. Strzok opened the investigation on July 31 , 2016. Before he had interviewed single witness, he was saying "F Trump" and calling Trump a "menace."

Then Strzok went on, first not remembering writing the the text message saying "We will stop (Trump)" and then pulling this one out:

Then he added that he really didn't mean that and we had to understand him in context. He referred to Trump voters as "ignorant hillbillies" and he could "smell" them.

Then he asserted that he didn't mean that either and we had to understand him in context.

And now he doesn't remember who he was talking about. Then John Radcliffe absolutely blasted Strzok

You hit on something that should be used for a Free Republic open debate.

Pit Hillary, then Obama, then Bill, then Mueller and so on against the two possibilities: sociopath or psychopath.

Let FReepers decide.

I think we agree. Evil is out there, it exists, but to do evil you have to grant it that power. Good wins as long as you choose good. Human nature has both but we have the power to choose the good of our nature. We will always be given one or more good choices.

In the history of the Hebrew people, the Lord declared Himself to be their righteousness.

That’s the way humanity was meant to be, but it was given a choice to say yes or no.

Saying yes after having first said no means to also submit to a salvation process, in which the burden of sin is borne and sin is pardoned. This is the thing that New Testament preachers bring out explicitly. For some people, it was not enough to be told of a pardon of sin and a salvation, to be able to believe in such a thing. They had to see it. And God stooped that low.

We have various possibilities for God to operate, but anyone who has really wallowed in sin knows that having done that can result in corruption that will sometimes last for years. After Moses unsuccessfully tried to get a plan going where he would avenge upon evildoers to work salvation (whereupon his own people became frightened of him. a result that he obviously didn’t want) it took 40 years of wilderness to learn to be humble before God. Then he came to the burning bush, and a story of salvation by God’s power unfolded. Not everybody has 40 years of wilderness, of course. But the need for a walk through the wilderness remains for all who would be conduits of salvation.

Yes, but the Dems really are just hacks, tutti.

I think it was Michael Walsh who described them as: a criminal enterprise disguised as a political party. And he wasn’t just talking post JFK modern dems, no, he went all the way back. It was an amazing piece, they truly are a bunch of crooks.

The party of slavery, bad irish, communists, and now every sexual deviant known to man, and their ne plus ultra: Abortion!

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.