Replies

Show me where in the extensive proceedings that accompanied the enactment of the 14th Amendment, there is any constitutional “intent” to establish a right of homosexual marriage.

The argument was that if two adults have the right to get married, then, under Equal Protection, that means ANY two competent adults. Excluding homos denies them a protection accorded heterosexuals (also known as "normal people") based solely on their sexual orientation.

That's the argument. I don't buy it, but at least it's better than inventing a "penumbra" or stating that 4 + 1 is somehow unequal to 2 + 3.

Show me where in the extensive proceedings that accompanied the enactment of the 14th Amendment, there is any constitutional “intent” to establish a right of homosexual marriage.

There is none. This is judge-made law. This is tyranny, a usurpation of authority.

That ruling creating sodomite marriage was lawless to the core. Sodomites deserve death, not honor. Marriage was estabished by God for one man and one woman. Jesus reminded the Pharisees in Matthew 19:3-6 what God intended from the beginning. No scripture documents God ever changing this covenant.

The Bible condemns sodomite behavior, never praises it, punishing it with death (Leviticus 20:13). And Romans 1 (and Jude) explains that this behavior is worthy of death, Sodom and Gomorrah being an example for us even today.