Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

Ft. Sumter was under siege even before the shelling started. They cut off supplies and threatened to stop any resupply. That is itself an act of war. Lincoln’s position was quite clear, he wouldn’t start hostilities but he would do what he had to do to keep all federal installations in the south. The south chose war, and yes the common sentiment was all for it. And the common sentiment in the north was for war if needed to keep the union together. But the south initiated it, and no historical revisionism can change that.


382 posted on 06/23/2018 6:18:26 AM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]


To: Hugin
You don't get to force facts to fit your theory. Lincoln sent warships to attack the South. Had he not done so, there would have been no war started at Charleston.

Lincoln's cabinet told him the sending of those warships would start a war. Major Anderson said it would start a war. The person who is responsible for starting a war is Lincoln, and no one else.

493 posted on 06/25/2018 4:13:53 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson