The OOD was named Sarah, and the Tactical Action Officer was named Natalie, and they weren’t speaking to each other!!! The Tactical Action Officer would normally be in near constant communication with the OOD, but there is no record of any communication between them that entire shift!
I admit upon reading the article, that was the first thought I had simply because of the way it was worded, which I believe was done intentionally.
I don't agree with that if it was. There is enough here without making stuff up.
When someone says "This happened because those two weren't talking to each other" that means something quite different than "They were not following established communication protocols".
If it were true they were having a disagreement and weren't on speaking terms, I would have them both jailed for a minimum of 20 years. That would put me over the edge. But unless someone has proof of that, I think it is a slander.