Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jjotto
From Wikipedia, so there's a chance it's factual:

"In Clinton v. City of New York, the Supreme Court found that the line-item veto violated the Presentment Clause of the Constitution, which says that the president does not have the power to unilaterally amend or repeal legislation passed by Congress."

4 posted on 03/22/2018 8:43:23 AM PDT by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: daler

However, in the case of “Obama vs. America”, apparently it was found constitutional for some presidents, depending on party and race, to do whatever they like.


8 posted on 03/22/2018 8:45:29 AM PDT by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: daler

huh?

Repeat: Line item veto would require a Constitutional amendment.


10 posted on 03/22/2018 8:46:45 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson