I agree with everything you just wrote except "Sessions had a plan all along." It was clear to me when DAG Rosenstein appointed Mueller (the day after President Trump had interviewed Mueller) that Trump and Sessions had a plan all along, and I believe it is playing out brilliantly.
Trump might have directed Sessions to do so, but it could never be admitted. That is why I say it is Session’s plan.
“Trump and Sessions had a plan all along, and I believe it is playing out brilliantly.”
That’s been my position all along. Their strategy of strict non-obstruction was the smart move, and was executed flawlessly.
But to be honest, it’s not exactly 4D chess or Art of the Deal stuff - it’s kind of obvious that the slightest hint of even the appearance of obstruction would have been like throwing gasoline on the fire.
So, - let the investigation go on, - let Mueller pick whoever he wants, - let Trump and Sessions keep arms length, - don’t go off half cocked with indicting Democrats just to provide red meat for the base, - go ahead and occasionally Twitter about how frustrated you are with Jeff Sessions.
It all seems kind of a no brainer to me - not 4D chess.
I wonder what the Sessions bashers expect would have happened if Sessions had not recused himself, had tried to block Mueller’s appointment or limit its scope, or had attacked Clinton/Obama corruption like a pit bull?
Do they think the status would have been better than it is now? Would the impeach Trump frenzy of last year have dissapated as it has, or would it have exploded into a full fledged Watergate scandal?
I say the latter. I think Trump/Sessions picked the correct approach. Trump wins. Again.