Yes, I agree that Sessions has announced an outside prosecutor.
Yes, he was able to cough up some “consideration” of a Special Counsel as his answer to a persistent, and now screaming, Congressional appeal for one.
Our difference is only in regard to Sessions. I see him on the Rubenstein leash and Rubenstein very possibly on the Mueller leash. I see that deference has been given to Mueller and it obscures how little Rubenstein and Sessions have produced, in 2017.
At FBI, there is deference to the Inspector General and that Wray gives sworn testimony to oversight and Intel Committees, where he answers ”No”
to having any knowledge about evidence these committees picked up, in their own investigations.
So wth is FBI doing? They seem to hide behind the months long IG work to obscure how little they have initiated. I don’t get it.
Both institutions have been totally and completely absorbed their manpower into getting Trump, while totally and completely avoiding the lopsided magnitude of evidence against Hillary. Somewhere along the line Arkansas may hold key on the Clintons, by digging into the Clinton Foundation, but that investigation is so old that I have forgotten by now who it was that even initiated that investigation.
It’s curious that JD and FBI only now they find a heartbeat to peek at Fast and Furious and Eric Holder’s revolution inside the JD. They’ve been sitting on top of his records ever since they walked in the front door of the Justice Department, Where they could have just waddled down the hallway and snoop through them. Weird.
I think the Republic is nearly finished - the deep state corruption has gone on too long - perhaps they’ve done too much damage over the last 50 years to expect a recovery.
Ideally, Trump would do two things:
1) drain the swamp, fix the republic, make it accountable to the people again going forward for our children and grandchildren.
2) punish those responsible, bring them to justice (the most recent ones anyway, those that are still alive).
But let me ask you a tough question: if you had to choose either number 1) or number 2), which would you choose?
It’s a no brainer - number 1) of course.
Number 2) would be sweet, but not if it jeopardizes number 1).
Trump is a tactical thinker and a deal maker. He is disciplined and capable of giving up something that would feel good in order to increase the odds of securing what is important.