Cruelty is letting more and more kids get vaccines that could be linked to the physical causes of autism
But I can understand why the pharma industry and vax deniers would make every argument about why NOT to do a simple blood test that could prove them right
Cruelty is subjecting a kid to potentially lethal illnesses just because some guy ran a scam over a decade ago trying to get parents to have their kids vaccinated with a vaccine that he had a financial interest in.
Now, can you please explainand be as technical as you want, Im a scientist, I understand technological languagethe mechanism by which a vaccine affects a childs genome, which that child has has since birth? How does the vaccine go back in time to change the childs genes?
Also, FYI, blood tests are routinely performed on newborns. My point is that once routine blood tests rule out autism at birth, why would you subject a child to another painful blood test? That seems like an extreme and cruel way to try to prove something that never was scientifically valid.