Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Sopater

“That doesn’t mean that private militias should have tanks and missile launchers...”

Why not? In the defense of Charleston Harbor in June, 1776, Col. Moultrie loaned his cannons to the South Carolina militia. He had the cannons stored in his barn. Those cannons defeated and turned back the British warships that tried to invade Sullivan Island.

Stupid liberals don’t know history.

I don’t know many who know how to operate a tank, but I’m sure we could learn. Give us tanks. And mortars. And RPGs.


28 posted on 02/19/2018 7:13:57 AM PST by sergeantdave (Teach a man to fish and he'll steal your gear and sell it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sergeantdave

True that... private militias should have access to anything that they allow their gov’t to have.


42 posted on 02/19/2018 7:46:50 AM PST by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: sergeantdave

Actually, in those days the majority of the biggest arms were owned by civilians. Cannon and warships were primarily owned by shipping companies. Even in England, civvie companies had cannon to defend against pirates and Muslim raiders.


94 posted on 03/01/2018 9:40:39 AM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson