Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Bulwyf

Saving the Union was more important.


19 posted on 02/12/2018 5:27:18 AM PST by cowboyusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: cowboyusa

Saving the union so the feds could tyrannize the population 150 years later? No thanks. This union sucks. Actually it’s an empire now.


20 posted on 02/12/2018 5:29:28 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: cowboyusa

Saving the Behemoth was more important.

There needs to be a reset back to the original constitution.


21 posted on 02/12/2018 5:30:18 AM PST by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: cowboyusa
Saving the Union was more important.

So why wasn't saving the Union of the United Kingdom just as morally valid?

Our founders articulated the principle that people had a right to independence, and so they broke from the United Kingdom. Why isn't this same principle valid for people who wanted to break from the United States?

104 posted on 02/12/2018 9:10:01 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson