https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2017/february/unemployment-rate-dynamics-us-europe
I think there might have been a very few quarters of 3+% growth, but not many.
www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3616076/posts
you might find more tools for your toolbox here:
Every economic number for eight years was revised downward (negatively) after the initial announcement. Every formula based number was given a new formula to sway the numbers artificially for the news cycles and to avoid inflation related increases to Soc Sec, DoD retirements, etc.
GDP 2008-2016....dork...
Que the picture of toilet flushing.
The problem is one number would be reported under Obama and then revised downward.
Catching a snapshot of the revised figures might be difficult.
http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/27/news/economy/gdp-report/index.html
GDP report: Economic growth revised lower
by Annalyn Censky @CNNMoney
September 27, 2012: 9:49 AM ET
The U.S. economy grew even slower than initially reported in the second quarter, as both consumers and businesses spent less than originally thought, and the drought in the Midwest limited agricultural production.
Gross domestic product, the broadest measure of the nation’s economic health, grew at an annual rate of 1.3% from April to June, the Commerce Department said Thursday, slower than the 1.7% rate the government last reported in August...
http://money.cnn.com/2012/08/29/news/economy/gdp-report/index.html?iid=EL
Gross domestic product, the broadest measure of the nation’s economic health, grew at an annual rate of 1.7% from April to June, the Commerce Department said Wednesday, slightly higher than the 1.5% rate originally reported, and in line with economists’ expectations.
cooking the books as the 2012 re-election loomed.