If your definition of a news site is CNN and similar, you wouldn’t look to the WH website for reputable information about new developments. If your definition is a reliable source of important new information, you’d definitely include the WH website in the mix.
I covered Trump’s tweet elsewhere. He doesn’t use his tweets to lie. He wouldn’t ask what happened to Podesta if he knew something had happened. He asked by way of highlighting how biased Mueller’s investigation is.
The idea that Trump’s tweets can mean whatever a conspiracist wants them to mean is bogus. Trump has been asking about Hillary too. According to the going conspiracy, has she also been secretly arrested?
Trump has treated Hillary and Podesta just alike in his tweets. He wants to know why nothing is happening to either one. In the same interview Trump reaffirmed his disappointment with Sessions. Trump has already connected the dots. It’s all right there in black and white.
President Trump is drawing attention to the mysterious federal court case against Imran Awan, the former IT aide to a number of congressional Democrats, including former Democratic National Committee chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
“Whatever happened to this Pakistani guy who worked with the DNC?” the president asked in an interview published Thursday by the New York Times.
- - - - - -
Fox News thinks the President is “drawing attention” to this. What do you think?