Hard to find causality with that or with the Ham Radio license deal.
It is however a curious point of interest that should be eyeballed.
We’re in a period where we have very hard evidence, email, positions, meetings and are now venturing into preponderances of coincidences.
I hope they don’t get used as tools to discredit and cloud the hard evidence. Don’t get sidetracked. Don’t draw concrete conclusions.
> Hard to find causality with that or with the Ham Radio license deal.
It was speculated the HAM radio license was for communicating on networks not recorded by the NSA.
Wouldn’t it be something if the NSA, knowing of all this corruption in advance, got tipped off and started monitoring HAM frequencies?
I must have missed something. What is the "Ham Radio license deal"?