No question.
Kate’s Wall (hat tip to another)
Kate’s Gate
Golly Gee Mr President, why don’t you Order ICE to immediately descend upon San Francisco with an army of 1000 plus Agents and begin Rounding up ALL ILLEGAL ALIENS in that County. While you are at it, you can SIEZE the Assets of all persons and businesses giving “harbor or aid” to these Criminal Invaders.
YOU HAVE THE LAW ON YOUR SIDE!!!
Steinle = Illegal immigration = Trump’s signature issue = Build The Wall! = Vote them out.
Trump’s right again. And he’s about the only one who’ll say it.
I listened intently to last nights Tucker Carlson interview of Sessions, hoping I would hear either Carlson or Sessions address the federal felony crime of harboring illegal aliens. Not a peep by either one. All Sessions could talk about was his lousy fine approach, which is now tied up in the courts and will be until hell freezes over. What is wrong with this lunacy? If ever there was a federal crime that squarely addresses the criminal conduct of providing “sanctuary” to illegal aliens it is 8 U.S.C 1324.
A disgraceful verdict in the Kate Steinle case! No wonder the people of our Country are so angry with Illegal Immigration.
The Kate Steinle killer came back and back over the weakly protected Obama border, always committing crimes and being violent, and yet this info was not used in court. His exoneration is a complete travesty of justice.
BUILD KATE'S WALL!
If the names of those jury members were given out,I wouldn’t give 10¢ for their chances.
Nobody would be bitching if jury nullification were happening for their own pet peeves/projects.
A travesty of justice? Yes, but what has Trump/Sessions *DONE* re: CA/sanctuary cities/illegality (aside from a few wall prototypes)??
NOBODY arrested in govt, no known actions being made to find the frauds in the IRS/welfare systems, a few ‘crackdowns’ by ICE, but nothing else.
Now, AFTER the verdict was rendered, they do something, but not since Jan. when Trump could have sent out a STRONG message re: law and equality that *might* have been in the jury’s mind to indict instead of cut loose.