Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: semimojo

.
>> “SCOTUS only agreed to hear the case and may well end up agreeing with them after they do” <<

You have no contact with reality!

This is/was a clear cut “Separation of Powers” issue, and there is nothing really for the court to wade into.

The 9-0 decision is a clear indication that they know they have no venue on the actions the president took.
.


14 posted on 06/27/2017 6:31:32 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor

“Semimojo” is a lefty that has somehow managed to escape the zot - just look at past posts, always the “contrarian”. But he won’t escape for much longer.

Want to see what I mean? Ask semi who he voted for in 2016 and watch he/she/it squirm.


17 posted on 06/27/2017 7:33:07 PM PDT by safeasthebanks ("The most rewarding part, was when he gave me my money!" - Dr. Nick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor
This is/was a clear cut “Separation of Powers” issue, and there is nothing really for the court to wade into.

Maybe you should tell SCOTUS.

"To begin, we grant both of the Government’s petitions for certiorari and consolidate the cases for argument. The Clerk is directed to set a briefing schedule that will permit the cases to be heard during the first session of October Term 2017."

20 posted on 06/27/2017 7:57:11 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson