You do not seem to understand that all that Sovereign Citizen claptrap is meaningless. If you have been damaged, you seek your remedy in court, not in the seat of an airplane where to remain, in and of itself, is a violation of federal law.
If you want to see how those Sovereign Citizens encounters play out, I suggest you review the numerous “Sovereign Citizens Owned” videos on youtube.
I especially love the woman who told the police dispatcher that the cops pursuing her for speeding had no right to stop her, and she would stop only if the State promised to pay her $3,000,000. She drove on recklessly for many minutes. She lost her vehicle and had 90 days as a guest of the county to review the wisdom of her choices.
The issue now is not whether or not United had legal grounds to order him to leave the a/c but his violation of federal law in not doing so.
Again, if he was damaged by a United’s improper DEMAND to vacate the a/c, he could have sought his remedy in court. By resisting, he has greatly diminished his chances to do so.
Secondly, regarding his early conversations, before he was arrested, which you claim do not exist? Please review the video at https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3323084/united-airlines-video-passenger-dragged-off-flight-dr-david-dao-latest/ and other links with even better views of Dao.
In it, you can hear Dao lie to LEOs that he has to do surgery the next day. When they tell him they will physically remove him from the flight, he dares them to do so, and when told he will end up in jail, says ok.
It’s very simple. He had a legal avenue to pursue possible damages for being improperly told to leave the a/c, which he has now thrown away and he had a chance to solve the problem multiple times, but he threw that away too.
Please do not bother to respond, as I ignore the Sovereign Citizen BS.
“Please do not bother to respond”
Bleieve me, I had no intention of doing so.