Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Sean_Anthony

Can’t take this seriously as it starts with a false premise. There was no overbooking.


11 posted on 04/12/2017 6:44:42 PM PDT by LeoTDB69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LeoTDB69

“Can’t take this seriously as it starts with a false premise. There was no overbooking.”

And they can deny boarding but once a passenger takes his seat it is a different rule.


20 posted on 04/12/2017 6:51:36 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: LeoTDB69

Thank you for pointing that out.


30 posted on 04/12/2017 7:10:09 PM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: LeoTDB69

Yup. I can’t believe the number of people who weigh in on this and still don’t understand the basic facts. Whatever your opinion is of this, it was not overbooking....it was the perceived need of an airline to get priority staff to a location that required (on their part/in their minds) the relocation of paying passengers. That should have been done before boarding.


74 posted on 04/12/2017 8:40:15 PM PDT by Parthy (I am a conservative. I just want to be left alone .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson