One of Obama’s most distinctive tactical traits is that he is a cowardly sneak. It’s true he can be relentless if he thinks he has the upper hand in a legalistic battle, but he’s often a sneak.
How did he get started in politics? He got one competitor off the ballot on a technicality at the last moment (signature validation) when there wasn’t time to correct it. Then he moved up, and in another election he somehow obtained and leaked the sealed marital divorce records—nasty unproven claims and all—shortly before the election.
Here, he has Susan Rice, maybe pushed by John Brennan, unmask the Trump group’s records in great detail, hiding behind claims of national security and near-treasonous conduct with the Russians. Then, as he walks out the WH door—2 or 3 days before—he vastly expands the number of people who can see the unmasked intelligence and leak it anonymously and out of context.
Yeah, he’ll pretend his hands are clean, and that he’s wiser and more balanced than oh, Morgan Freeman or Nelson Mandela.
Lets be real. How long do you think a Republican could get away with investigating a Democrat presidential candidate for anything? Hillary is obviously guilty of blatant, egregious violation of security regulations. It could scarcely be clearer. And with that smoking gun before us, the Obama Administration claims - admittedly without evidence - that the Republican president-elect must be investigated over red-herring claims of Russian influence on the the election.It all boils down to the fact that wire service journalism is a monolithic anti-conservative political establishment. And the sheeple cant, and wont, see it.