Posted on 03/04/2017 5:46:48 AM PST by Helicondelta
President Trump exploded on Twitter early Saturday morning, blasting former President Barack Obama for allegedly wire tapping his phones before the election.
Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my wires tapped in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism! he declared.
Is it legal for a sitting President to be wire tapping a race for president prior to an election? Turned down by court earlier. A NEW LOW! he added.
Trump has the authority to declassify almost any classified material, and could substantiate his accusations if he wanted to.
The Saturday-morning Twitter storm was striking as Trump and Obama had largely appeared to paper over their differences at least publicly since the election.
(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...
‘’The crime was not in getting the wiretap. Barky did it legally. The crime was using false information to substantiate and request it. Obamas court denied it the first time and he narrowed the request (probably as advised) and resubmitted it.”
Ok, so did they use the meeting arranged by Valerie Jarrett between Sessions and the Russian Ambassador as the justification for their narrower FISA request, which was then granted? Does that time line fit?
“The media will portray Trump as hysterical and paranoid. Film at 5.”
Why would the mediots change?
They have doing the above with their coverage of Trump since last year.
I was wondering why Valerie Jarrett reportedly was moving into Obama’s DC home...they might be hunkering down in their new bunker to avoid apprehension.
“Popcorn. The Kenyan could be going down.”
I will only believe that when I see it.
I believe Valerie feels she may need some Secret Service protection. This gives it to her indirectly.
“And now Obama must respond not knowing what evidence Trump has.”
Good point. I am sure there are a lot of “viewings with concerns” going on at the Obama compound.
“if allowed by the FISA court?”
Do you have any evidence that FISA sanctioned the wiretap?
FISA only applies to foreign entities and their agents. Obama would have to make the case that Trump is a Russian spy to take this to FISA.
If all the evidence he has is a phone call between Mike Flynn and the Russian ambassador then this is a clear abuse of power.
This a is the greatest political Crime in our countries history. When I posted this yesterday it was just a glaze over because it was so out landish. Mark Levi broke this followed by Breitbart. WAPO just posted the allegation 1 hour ago but want to see “proof” . Thet will get to see ther fisa warrant which Trump now owns as president. This is the sacndal of all time!!
Yes. Obama's crap is weaker than without a paddle up S@#$* creek.
Wire-gate
What does “renewed and granted” mean in this case? Did Obama go to the FISA court with new incriminating evidence against Trump in October? Or go to a different FISA Judge?
How do we get a copy of the paper trail if “it is out there”?
Best Presidential honeymoon 90 days ever!
If they don’t get out and arrest people, it creates the appearance of nothing. Go bring folks in for questioning at least, put some cuffs on. I don’t want a tweet battle anymore, go pick up some folks involved. It’s payback time.
“turned down by court earlier”
Looks like there’s a pretty good paper trail to this.
O Crap got turned down by the court. see post 170.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3531343/posts?page=170#170
That’s what Jay Sekulow is going after with FOIA requests...
No I don’t have any evidence. Please don’t misunderstand. My point is exactly what I said previously.
The crime by Obama (in my humble opinion) is obtaining the wiretap under false pretenses. All details need to be exposed.
Obama alleged then candidate Trump had dealings with foreign (Russian) banks. I want this exposed as false.
I don’t think he can be jailed for wiretapping when a court authorized it. I do think he can be convicted for presenting false info to the court in order to obtain the wiretap.
” I wonder how often they open a headline with ______ cites no evidence any time a democrat makes such charges against republicans. “
A LOT.
Oddly, there was not a single hit in the search referencing any such match, exact or partial, for little bammy, upChuck, Nasty P., Frankinstine or ANY other neo-communist at all.
I extracted the following from the first 100 hits on a google search.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/trump-voter-fraud-sean-spicer-234120
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/17/bigfoot-conference-cites-_n_1526894.html
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/pakistan-not-to-ban-jud/article7399161.ece
http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/03/03/the-holodomor-and-the-film-bitter-harvest-are-fascist-lies/
Just to be sure, I ran the same exact search in Bing.
The differences in the results were hardly noticeable, the following are the only two instances I caught that were not the the google search.
Trump asks if CIA chief was source of fake news, but cites no evidence.
http://www.wtvy.com/content/news/Trump-asks-if-CIA-chief-was-source-of-fake-news-but-cites-no-evidence-410818025.html
GOP candidates blame Obama for police shootings, cite no evidence
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/gop-candidates-blame-obama-police-shootings-cite-no-evidence
Draw your own conclusions.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.