Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: PROCON

Not terribly excited about this bill, in part because it incorporates the commerce clause as a basis. The several States have their own reciprocity agreements, which seems different from what this bill is purporting to offer. Also, there is no provision for Constitutional carry, or for carrying in States with restrictive/no gun carry rules. Moreover, what if CA or NY bans concealed carry completely after this bill is passed?? The GOA-backed bill is better. I would improve it by giving the innocent the right to sue for civil rights violations if any government official violates the RTC. It would need to be a tightly written statute so that it would not be abused.


19 posted on 02/27/2017 9:33:28 AM PST by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SecAmndmt

The GOA-backed bill is better.


GOA is in favor of H.R.38.

Cornyn’s bill is supposed to mirror H.R. 38.

It has not been introduced yet, so we cannot check it word for word.


24 posted on 02/27/2017 11:30:10 AM PST by marktwain (We wanted to tell our side of the story. We hope by us telling our story...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson