"It's always, Milo Milo Milo"
Posted on 02/22/2017 9:35:50 AM PST by servo1969
Understood. I'd love to ask the author just that, but I can't make heads or tails of that hash it came from.
Very well said. I hope everyone reads it.
By definition, it is not pedophilia.
==============================================================
He said it's ok for men to have sex with a 13 year old so long as that 13 year old was sexually mature.
As for the definition...depends on whose defining it.
pedophilia
noun, Psychiatry.
1. sexual desire in an adult for a child.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/pedophilia
If you call it Pedophilia, Statutory Rape or illegrabenzen...it's wrong.
That's not what he said: that's what YOU said he said.
I am renaming this place Milo's Republic.
Milo Milo Milo. Ughhh
"It's always, Milo Milo Milo"
Another victory for Hillary Clinton and Obama—a Conservative silenced by violence—and right wing prejudice. The right was played like a fiddle over this one. Pedophilia is the lasy real Taboo in American society. Would this be an issue if he was on the left?
Verbatim? Right. Read/listen to what he’s saying, he’s condoning it, he’s justifying the act so long as the child is “sexually mature.”
I did listen. It's not my fault you can't tell the difference between your presumptions and actual facts.
“Understood. I’d love to ask the author just that, but I can’t make heads or tails of that hash it came from.”
Well, he seems to be strongly against older predators taking advantage of children and teens, and it seems he’s not willing to accept Milo’s premise that sex (or more accurately, pseudosexual perversions) between older men and 13-year-old boys can somehow be okay.
I commented because I think it’s important to be clear on the difference between pedophilia and hebephilia.
Hebephilia is a symptom of common, garden-variety homosexuality.
Pedophilia is another form of insanity altogether.
Conflating those two things allows the forces of evil to argue as follows:
1. Homosexuality and pedophilia are different things.
2. Most homosexuals are not pedophiles, and therefore
3. Most homosexuals have no desire to anally penetrate teenage boys.
4. It is therefore safe to leave young teenagers in the custody of homosexuals.
However, the fact that most homosexuals are not pedophiles indicates in no way that they are not hebephiles. That is one of the defining symptoms of same-sex attraction disorder.
I think, and have thought since before there was an Internet, that it is important to deny the sodomy Nazis the use of this argument.
The facts are that:
1. Homosexuality and pedophilia are different things.
2. Most homosexuals are not pedophiles, however
3. Most homosexuals *are* hebephiles and *do* desire to anally penetrate teenage boys.
4. It is therefore *not* safe to leave young teenagers in the custody of homosexuals.
Donald Trump has been accused of bragging about assaulting women, which he didn’t, and by extension, it was assumed that he must have actually assaulted women, which he didn’t.
What he actually said, in context, was that having wealth and fame makes it a whole lot easier for a guy to get laid.
Senator Larry Craig was another Republican who was destroyed for nothing.
He merely tapped his foot on the floor. Whether he knew this was, or whether he intended it to be, a solicitation for gay sex, is beside the point.
The fact is, tapping one’s foot is not sex, and is not a crime.
“If you call it Pedophilia, Statutory Rape or illegrabenzen...it’s wrong.”
Yes, it is wrong.
As to why it’s important what we call it, see my #70.
oh awesome, (/sarc)
That is a shame, hope he rethinks and reflects some of his statements.
Ya know what? I don’t love it either but we have some gays in our family as do most people and they are very lovable. So I leave it to God to decide.
Yep!
I know! I’m pretty anti-gay and even got a time out on this site when I wouldn’t go along with Trump being what I felt like was so pro-gay.
(I’m completely resolved of that and am now TOTALLY in President Trump’s corner. His speech at the Al Smith Dinner put me forever and always on his side, personally and as a president.)
But I agree with you, I found myself defending Milo. It just felt like a political career assassination for all the wrong reasons. I had actually already seen his Joe Rogan interview and it made me uncomfortable, but since I’ve never been a huge fan of his, I sort of just moved on.
Then Berkeley happened.
More likely Smothered Burritos.
If this logic makes sense, then it should apply elsewhere. For instance: "Klansmen and Skinheads and Timothy McVeigh reach out to people the rest of us could never reach, and preach the message of conservatism".
Bottom line: "We welcome anyone who wants to preach a message of conservatism, regardless of any other messages they also preach, or any of their actions."
I wonder where the NAMBLAesque phrase "Young Meat" falls within that spectrum? Saw it in a local police report over 20 years ago.
He did not opening endorse pedophilia. Quite being an ignorant intellectual fool.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.