As much as I dislike McCain, I find this very hard to believe. More Fake News making the rounds, probably.
Yeah, but Sarah Palin could see Russia from her balcony.
Couple of things wrong with any contribution made by Vitaly Churkin. If any were actually made, it would constitute a contribution made from foreign sources, presently illegal under campaign finance law. Secondly, what could John McCain possibly do for Vitaly Churkin? No known quid pro quo could exist.
Much more troubling are the contributions made to John McCain by George Soros. And that McCain could be bought so cheaply.
It’s in WikiLeaks. They are batting 1000 for accuracy. Unlike the real creators of fake news... CNN, etc.
“As much as I dislike McCain, I find this very hard to believe. More Fake News making the rounds, probably.”
It’s Wikileaks, it’s accurate - don’t get them confused with our media.
But it’s also generic, it doesn’t talk about how ‘relations could be improved’ by a ‘modest donation’ to McCain for President, for example. So it was probably one name from a list of 500,000 names...that will happen, but it means nothing until Russians actually give him money.
Even so...we should beat on McCain anyway - does anyone deny that Trump would not be let off if the letter had been written under his name?
>As much as I dislike McCain, I find this very hard to believe. More Fake News making the rounds, probably.
Me too. It’s mostly the size of the donation that I have a hard time believing, McCain’s not going to settle for something that small. And this is coming from a guy who thinks McCain should be hung for treason for arming ISIS and Al Qudia in Syria.