To: GeaugaRepublican
Surprise me? No, not in the least.
Until I see names associated with those naming McCain as the leaker, this goes right where every other un-named source and article that quotes them goes:
Right into the #FakeNews pile.
I refuse to believe ANYTHING that comes from "Unnamed Sources." Period.
55 posted on
02/21/2017 10:02:55 AM PST by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: usconservative
Right. There’s so much stuff floating around these days you don’t know what to believe anymore.
57 posted on
02/21/2017 10:03:52 AM PST by
rightwingintelligentsia
(Democrats: The perfect party for the helpless and stupid, and those who would rule over them.)
To: usconservative
I refuse to believe ANYTHING that comes from "Unnamed Sources." Period.I'm fairly skeptical about stuff coming from "Unnamed Sources" too, but if it is reported in multiple outlets that have developed a reputation over time of actually having legit sources in the know, I factor that in to how credible I believe the news to be.
When the sole report of a story is in a fairly obscure site like TruePundit as an "EXCLUSIVE" report from unnamed sources, I tend to think their sources are imaginary.
82 posted on
02/21/2017 10:21:40 AM PST by
Wissa
(Check out pussyhat.com)
To: usconservative
I refuse to believe ANYTHING that comes from "Unnamed Sources." Period. Unnamed sources said that Laz hits it with hot women.
115 posted on
02/21/2017 10:46:31 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(The "news" networks and papers are bitter, dangerous enemies of the American people.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson