I’m glad the writer calls this Watergate. That was nothing more than an information gathering spy mission. In pre internet days that meant a burglary.
Same thing, and 1000 times worse.
At first I thought this was from LazNewz. Working on expanding your Brand could be Yuge in the long run....
This is a good article.
Lock her up with H->!
Haul in Lurch and Hussein too.
If hse is found to be the leaker, execute her.
That clearly makes her an accessory / co-conspirator !
and that makes her involvment criminal.
If she is found to be the leaker, execute her.
As long as the press provides cover for underhanded actions against Trump nothing will happen to the conspirators. I wonder where the GOP is? Oh yeah, I believe they want Trump to fail. They aren’t helping him at all and they will pay the price when they come up for reelection.
Another fascist Obama skank. Lock her up.
I want to know if their was a warrant abs if it was FaiSA....if so then Trump needs to clean out that nest of vipe s
bump
The Republicans are SLOW- FOOTED, SLOW-WITTED WEAK SISTERS!!
If and WHEN they get around to do an investigation, it will be MONTHS from now and result in NOTHING!!
Love your dedication, but have a bit of an alternative explanation for some of this. Never had a matter with Ms. Yates, so I will accept your review of her.
I think the Bureau was not monitoring Flynn’s calls when he talked to the Sovs, but rather were monitoring the Sovs when they spoke with Flynn.
If the Sovs were known intel POIs, then it is reasonable to assume Bureau was conducting approved electronic surveillance on them. It’s not that Flynn was being objectively monitored, but rather his conversation was recorded when Flynn spoke to the Sovs in that legally recorded conversation, just as anyone who called the Sovs would have been.
That is not improperly obtained evidence, but it is Horse Hockeys
Now regarding Yates herself, she, as so many liberal lawyers do, set herself up to improperly use her office to try to derail the incoming administration. For that, I would have asked if she needed 5 minutes to remove at personal pictures from her office while the nice security officer here escorts her out of the building.
Be well. Keep our powder dry. The fight has just begun.
Lock her up...Jeff Sessions is going to be working overtime to drain the swamp.
I believe I read back in October(?) that someone in the obama admin got the FISA court to OK spying on Trump’s people. Justification was supposedly the whole “russian hacking” thing. I was amazed at the time that neither the msm nor Trump’s people didn’t shout it from the roofs.
I’ll bet the FISA court authorized Sally Yates to tap the phones of several Trump key people prior to the election. And I’ll venture to guess all of their calls have been scrutinized in depth, with transcripts circulating.
Did she then leak intercepted calls to the press, as it is apparent she is leaking part of the story now?
She should have already been Arrested and Locked up for National Security Reasons to prevent the Unlawful disclosure of TOP SECRET NATIONAL SECURITY INTELLIGENCE!
good article. We will be discussing this gal again I believe.
Trump: Ask Sally Yates About Classified Information Leaked to Media
Breitbart ^ | 8 May 2017 | Kristina Wong
Posted on 5/8/2017, 2:15:07 PM by detective
President Trump suggested to Senators on Monday morning that they ask Sally Yates, former Obama administration deputy attorney general and acting attorney general in the Trump administration’s early days, how classified information she went to the White House counsel with got leaked to the media soon after.
Ask Sally Yates, under oath, if she knows how classified information got into the newspapers soon after she explained it to W.H. Council.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 8, 2017
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3551249/posts