Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: arrogantsob

It was still anti-slave and anti-slaveholder, as it limited the power of slaveholding states, based, well, on slavery.


6 posted on 02/10/2017 12:32:31 PM PST by Lord Castlereagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Lord Castlereagh
The truth is that the founders from the northern colonies who opposed Slavery, insisted on counting the slaves as less than “full persons.” The reason for the insistence, is to prevent the slave states from getting too many congressman and electoral votes as to dominate the government and prevent Slavery from ever being abolished. It was still anti-slave and anti-slaveholder, as it limited the power of slaveholding states, based, well, on slavery. I have argued that point countless times, all to no avail. I once considered it my civic duty to inform/debate lefty imbeciles - but I no longer attempt it. Imbeciles are impervious to persuasion! Facts/reason/logic/and even THOUGHT, does not ever work for these fools. Pray for the future of the United Sates of America - Team Trump = MAGA!
19 posted on 02/10/2017 12:50:05 PM PST by heterosupremacist (Domine Iesu Christe, Filius Dei, miserere me peccatorem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Lord Castlereagh
It was still anti-slave and anti-slaveholder, as it limited the power of slaveholding states, based, well, on slavery.

Actually it gave slaveholding states a disproportionately high level of representation. Slaves were considered property and not people, so they had no need for Congressional representation. Yet they were counted as 3/5ths when proportioning congressmen.

21 posted on 02/10/2017 12:52:25 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson