Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: hanamizu

I don’t really blame any troops for executing partisans or civilians who take potshots at them. Can’t hide behind non-combatant status when you’re trying to shoot someone in the back. I’m a bit surprised that soldiers caught with shotguns were executed (like somebody said, in a world of mustard gas and flamethrowers...), but soldiers in every war have taken a particular dislike to enemies using certain weapons. All sides in WW1 executed soldiers with sawback bayonets, and snipers usually didn’t fare well either when captured.


17 posted on 02/10/2017 9:28:23 AM PST by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Flag burners can go screw -- I'm mighty PROUD of that ragged old flag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

I don’t think that they actually did execute soldiers captured with shotguns, but they did threaten to. I believe we let them know that we’d retaliate if they tried such a thing. WWI Germans were a bit tone deaf when it came to wartime PR. Their execution of British nurse Edith Cavel for helping British POWs escape and their execution of Captain Charles Fryatt who tried to ram a U-Boat as an “illegal combatant” didn’t win them many friends.


23 posted on 02/10/2017 11:50:58 AM PST by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson