[El Cid]

I agree with your comments on Post #1.
The 'majority' Libs gave the anarchists cover.
If there had been one Klansman (I know, these are as common as unicorns) at the Tea Party gathering in Washington DC, the Media would have been harping about the violent, and vile, Tea Party people. Here, on the local Bay Area news, all I could hear was this was a 'mostly' peaceful demonstration, disrupted by a small minority of 'outsiders'.

I blame primarily (after the Media - who always skew the 'news' reporting to favor the leftists) the Berkeley police who let the Anarchists take control.
In the Bay Area they seem to step aside if conservatives are being attacked.
But, that aside, the liberal, 'peaceful', protesters give cover to the violent Anarchists. Similar to the 'moderate muslims' who give cover to the 'violent terrorists'. The moderates can disavow the violence - but they sure don't do anything to prevent it (or even impede it).

[AZLiberty]

How many “free-speech” Berkeley people took a stand against the “anarchists” in favor of Milo’s First Amendment rights?

[MuttTheHoople]

If there had been one Klansman (I know, these are as common as unicorns) at the Tea Party gathering in Washington DC, the Media would have been harping about the violent, and vile, Tea Party people. Here, on the local Bay Area news, all I could hear was this was a 'mostly' peaceful demonstration, disrupted by a small minority of 'outsiders'.

If it had been Klansmen, the Tea Partiers would've kicked their collective a$$es. The Tea Party doesn't abide with Democrat Terror Organizations.