Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump as Lightning Rod--Not Just for Disaffected Progressives, But For Panicked Insiders
Of Two Minds ^ | 16 January 2017 | Charles Hugh Smith

Posted on 01/18/2017 2:25:45 PM PST by Lorianne

The Eastern Establishment fears and loathes Outsiders, and seeks to destroy them, usually via the mainstream media.

Political agnostics who are skeptical about Big Government "solutions," left or right, view the current hullabaloo about the Trump presidency with some detachment. What's remarkable to us is the extremism, not just of those bitter about Clinton's loss, but by insiders who are threatened by the possibility Trump may upset their insider skims and scams.

As an opening observation, I don't recall bitter Nixon supporters issuing death threats to performers at John Kennedy's inauguration in 1961--and the 1960 election was extremely close.

I also don't recall bitter Gore supporters issuing death threats to performers at G.W. Bush's inauguration in 2001--even though the 2000 election came down to a few hundred votes in Florida.

Trump is a lightning rod for a spectrum of people and organizations. Let's see if we can separate the spectrum into socio-political groups.

In times of turmoil, identifying a bogeyman/woman as the cause of the turmoil is a classic mechanism for shirking responsibility and agency. This is the psychological source of witch-hunts (it's all the witches' fault!), scapegoating, show trials, and so on: it isn't our fault things are falling apart, or the fault of our institutions--it's the bogeyman/woman's fault.

This transference/projection concentrates the blame and responsibility on The Other--a scapegoated group, or even better, one individual or a small group. Those making the accusation reckon pointing the finger at some target lets them off the hook: I am blameless, it's all his/her fault.

Trump is tailor-made for the part of Bogeyman--ditto the Russians. Decades of films depicting the heroic Americans besting the low-down dirty Commies seem to have seeped into the American Id: when in doubt, blame the Russians. If they are temporarily unavailable for scapegoating, then blame an Asian bogeyman.

For Progressives, symbolism is more important than substance. Never mind that the incomes, wealth and opportunities of the bottom 95% have steadily eroded in the eight years of the Obama presidency, or that an American neocon-neoliberal foreign policy was running amok globally. To Progressives steeped in the mythology of political correctness, the symbolism of the speech acts being uttered mattered far more than the substance or the consequences.

President Obama did not just promise hope and change--he was a legal-eagle master of delivering the symbolic speech acts that Progressives longed to hear, because they confirmed the world-view of legalisms, "rights," and all the other high points of the mythology of political correctness.

In other words, we don't actually have to threaten the status quo by changing anything, all we have to do is utter the correct phrases, and the erosion of civil liberties, opportunity and wealth will all magically vanish in the warm and fuzzy phraseology of political correctness.

SNIP (there is more)


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: media
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: antidisestablishment
You are a blinkered, biased, uneducated fool; that's what you truly are...judging things from a hindsight and not from what WAS, back then!

You're dismissed....I don't suffer fools, not engage with them, once they've proved to be obdurate in their uneducated position.

21 posted on 01/18/2017 6:27:37 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Mao’s murderous reign was well-known at the time. I see you can easily set aside millions of dead as well.

I am biased, because I grew up under Nixon’s legacy and see its effects today. None of you Nixon hagiographers ever answer the bigger questions about Nixon’s unconstitutional power grabs, but I guess those were also historic necessities. Of course that’s just my blinkered, biased, obdurate, uneducated, deplorable view.


22 posted on 01/18/2017 7:01:11 PM PST by antidisestablishment ( We few, we happy few, we basket of deplorables)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: antidisestablishment
So I see that you would have much preferred a CHINA/USSR alliance, which together would have done much more to destabilized the world. Nice.....NOT!

You weren't even alive back then, I see, from your idiotic reply and do not understand anything at all about that time. Go talk to your reflection....that way you can remain in that bubble you live in, sans facts, sans knowledge, sans understanding.

23 posted on 01/18/2017 7:27:59 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson