Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: wally_bert

Many of Kodak’s early digital cameras were plagued with bad firmware. Not all, but most. Sounds like you dodged that bullet.

The most annoying symptom of poor firmware was the camera’s battery voltage detection logic. Unless the batteries were brand new, the camera would display a low voltage warning and shut off. So you had to either spend a fortune buying new alkaline AA’s all the time, or constantly top off the charge of your NiCads. In either case, fresh batteries lasted about 5 minutes.

Well-known issue at that time.


13 posted on 01/09/2017 10:52:49 AM PST by ConservativeWarrior (Fall down 7 times, stand up 8. - Japanese proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeWarrior

Never had a problem with the unit.

I used it 360 virtual tours until I got a 20D.


15 posted on 01/09/2017 10:54:50 AM PST by wally_bert (I didn't get where I am today by selling ice cream tasting of bookends, pumice stone & West Germany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeWarrior
"Many of Kodak’s early digital cameras were plagued with bad firmware."

In the early days of digital cameras you'd spend $300 - $400 on one and in 4 months it was totally outdated.

18 posted on 01/09/2017 10:57:44 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson