Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Fantasywriter
So you’re saying there is no positive evidence that Stanley Ann Dunham was in HI at the time of the birth?

And none that she wasn't.

45 posted on 01/05/2017 10:45:20 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

Other than the fact that she wasn’t living at the address listed on the birth certificate? Other than the fact that no one has the slightest clue where, in HI, she might have been?

Obama is the only POTUS for whom there is no residence prior to or subsequent to the birth. Numerous Obama-friendly biographers (understatement) have searched for the residence, and come up with only a nine-mo long black hole. The first we see of Stanley Ann following the birth, she’s in WA state.

How did she get there?


48 posted on 01/05/2017 10:55:31 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

Here is a piece of evidence to ponder. Namely, whose arrival in HI during the week of Obama’s supposed birth had to be concealed by criminally vandalizing the National Archives?

“The Arpaio report, for instance, noted that “the INS records for foreign flights arriving in Hawaii during the week of Obama’s birth were missing, not only on the microfilm reels examined, but also in the primary database itself.”

The unique absence of these records from the file strengthens the argument that Obama was born somewhere other than Hawaii and perhaps some time other than August 4, 1961.”

http://www.cashill.com/intellect_fraud/will_wa_po.htm


52 posted on 01/05/2017 11:13:56 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg
So you’re saying there is no positive evidence that Stanley Ann Dunham was in HI at the time of the birth?

And none that she wasn't.

There is some evidence that she wasn't. Firstly, the evidence indicating she was in Seattle Washington in mid to late august with an infant child. Back when this issue was being heavily discussed, some freepers looked up the flight schedules and rules for all commercial traffic to and from Hawaii in 1961.

The rules indicated you could not fly with an infant as young as Barrack. (14-15 days old)

Barack Obama Sr had written in one of his letters that their original intention was to put Barry up for adoption. Vancouver had a well known home for unwed mothers at the time, plus free Canadian healthcare was available.

That a young girl would be "sent away" to have an embarrassing pregnancy (young white girl impregnated by a black man in 1960?) was not at all unusual in this era.

Stanley Ann's Aunt (Eleanor Dunham Berkebile) lived in Canada in 1959, (her children are buried there.) and later she lived in Blaine Washington. (Right on the Canadian Border)

That a young woman was sent to live with her Aunt makes a lot more sense than that she chose to leave her family's home to go live by herself right after her first child was born. Also there was the problem of getting a commercial flight with a 15 day old infant.

The story they told us doesn't make as much sense as the alternative that she was sent away to have the baby, and then decided to keep him.

61 posted on 01/05/2017 12:02:56 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson