Posted on 12/14/2016 11:18:47 AM PST by Yashcheritsiy
“Well, in this particular excerpt its used to imply that any conservative who doesnt hold or express white supremist views is somehow cuckolded.”
Uh huh. Told to you by the same sources that constantly lie to you on everything else, but that’s just gotta be true, right?
An old FR classic.
A Philadelphia school crossing guard bumped into a kid who called him “fatso” every day and decided to knock him out.
I cannot take credit for it, but it was a classic of old guys.
“http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2544557/posts?page=9"
“This just in: 14 year old boy learns that a 60 year old man arrives at that stage of life after having been a soldier/longshoreman/police officer/martial arts expert/sharpshooter/corrections officer/serial killer/ex-con/construction laborer/professional boxer/hitman or any combination thereof. These experiences are combined with the use or abuse of drugs and alcohol over a period of decades and then filtered with prejudices, relational disappointments, frustrations, and a fear of what the future holds. Lapping over all of this is a wash of irrational anger that the powers he once commanded are slipping through his fingers. Now from behind the young mans lifted blinders, he can clearly see that he has been in the presence of an infinitely dangerous predator with skills, experience, and motives that are far beyond his comprehension. If he has wisdom, the young man would make amends to the elder and thank him for administering a lesson that may well extend his years on this planet. If not, I wouldnt give him odds past 16.”
"...but also mainstream conservatives. These cuckservatives think theyre being bold and edgy when they support the 2nd amendment. Lets see them start telling the truth about transsexualism being a mental illness, or about the implication of IQ disparities between different racial groups. Its when you get into those realms that you start separating the men from the boys.Nobody thought the term was racial, just that the application in this case implies a lack of white supremacist views.
Told to me by the excerpt posted on Free Republic.
Please keep in mind that anyone who’s not certified and approved as a PC drone neo-marxist is always slurred as a nazi by the same folk who work so hard to manufacture and maintain the opinions of those too lazy or stupid to do their own research.
It’s never a good idea to make assumptions about FReepers, but if you insist on doing so, you should play it safe and assume they’re ahead of you.
None of that has anything to do with the word in question.
The word in question does, very much apply to those who might intellectually know they’re constantly being lied to by the media but emotionally and/or psychologically constantly fall for the lies anyway.
We all need to start paying real close attention. This cultural war just starting to hot up. It only gets worse from here.
Cuck is a very appropriate term to apply to those in the GOPe that live on their knees in obedience to those who they publicly claim to oppose.
They are weak. Stupid. Spineless. Cucks.
Now, you can get all bent out of shape over it. No. One. Cares.
The fight is on. Play your virtue signaling games. Snipe at your allies behind their backs. It’s all expected, actually.
And again.
No. One. Cares.
Play time and nice nice are over.
So you can’t back your position.... No surprise there.
Can’t back my position?
How about this.
For decades now, the left has been running rampant through ALL of our institutions and positions of power.
The nice nice people of the “conservative” side have accomplished exactly nothing in slowing them down, let alone stopping them. Not. One. Thing.
That time is over. You can, of course, ignore the situation. Your choice. But there’s been a rather serious sea change recently.
Now, the fight is being fought by people who actually understand that this is a fight. A fight to the knife and the knife to the hilt.
Play time is over. The nice nice types had their chance. They failed. They’re no longer relevant.
The best they can do is try to get in the way of those that are fighting the fight that they, themselves, should be fighting but wont because they can’t even comprehend that this is an actual fight. It’s not a game.
You can have the last word. I’m done.
This is how you conduct your glorious fight? By calling names and running away?
Ain’t that the truth!
Much of what you say is true. Without those who actually saw this election as the street brawl it was, we’d be about to witness the swearing in of HRC.
Mitt Romney played nice. John McCain played nice. Playing nice with the left gets you nothing but the loss of everything most of us hold dear. The Marquis of Queensbury rules are just fine as long as both sides abide, but we are in a place where one side played nice, and the other set about destroying the country and its institutions, brick by brick.
Between the genteel losers in the republican party like Mr. Romney, Mr. McCain, Mr. Graham, Mr. Flake, Ms. Collins and scores of others, give me a guy who at least understands that this is war, not the Harvard debating society. If some don’t like the word “cuck”, don’t use it. I don’t, it’s not my style (some of this is, in case you haven’t noticed, a generational thing) but I absolutely understand those who do, and don’t fault them a bit for their choice of sobriquet.
Basically, an ultimate wimp, a sellout, a two-faced cowardly type, usually self-serving. The opposite of “a standup guy not afraid to tell the truth as he sees it.” Modern, more insulting version of “RINO”, favored by people under 30, as far as I can see.
The theories in posts 13 and 15 are incorrect. The explanation in post 35 is the most accurate. Younger conservatives use the term to show contempt for conservatives-in-name-only. You see it a lot on Reddit's Trump pages. I do not believe that liberals invented the term, but rather that conservatives invented it to show contempt for people such as McCain or Graham who betray conservative values or positions while feeling entitled to the votes of conservatives.
It's not enough to simply hold "conservative" positions. Some people do so because they regard them as sound and logical. Others do because they are the traditional positions of either America or "western civilization." To hold such positions for these reasons is to miss the point entirely.
Homosexuality is wrong because G-d says so. Abortion is wrong when and because G-d says so. Everything that is right or wrong is so because G-d says so. Merely replacing a secular liberalism with a secular conservatism is inadequate.
Similarly, the Jews were chosen by G-d. The Torah was written by G-d. Any one, whatever his other positions might be, who opposes the Jewish people is in opposition to G-d, just like the homosexuals and abortionists are. Anti-Jewish, anti-Israel "conservatives" are a curse to our cause and will only bring Divine punishment on us. And I think we've had enough of that for these past eight years (in fact, much longer than that).
All the enemies of the Jewish People are evil, for that reason. I will have absolutely nothing to do with any of them except to oppose them all the way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.