Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: TheRef

I keep hearing claims that the Texas Republican party either has or is going to remove this guy and send one of the alternate electors instead. Supposedly there is a “faithfully fulfill your duties” provision that allows them to remove anybody who is unwilling or unable to fulfill their oath. But I can’t seem to find any “solid” confirmation one way or the other except for vague claims on twitter.


4 posted on 12/06/2016 6:55:28 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: apillar

Yes, it would be good to hear something definitive.


8 posted on 12/06/2016 7:01:10 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: apillar

That’s what we did in AZ when one of the delegates publicly said she was not going to cast her vote for Donald Trump at the Convention, although he won our State decisively. Like this fellow, the other side held her up as a pillar of virtue. When she showed up at the convention, (She showed up to the hotel in Cleveland we were at with her lawyers) guards escorted her out and we let someone who actually wanted to do their job take her place. That’s how you you do it.


9 posted on 12/06/2016 7:03:18 AM PST by Hildy ("The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it." Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson