The first links posted here to interviews on this topic were axed. This was a few days before the election. Soon, however, the reports about what the emails contain were everywhere and threads did stay.
The New York Times and its lieutenants have gone all out, including with headlines, in trying to make people not believe what they are reading. These documents cannot be ignored, nor can the astounding amount of shocking circumstantial evidence of a network of abnormality at its extreme.
I agree that “These documents cannot be ignored...”
I certainly don’t intend to ignore them, I’d like to know much more.