Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK
Our Founders' Declaration itemizes a "long train of abuses and usurpations", none of which Canadians endured.

And why, pray tell, did the British draw a distinction between the Canadians and the Americans in how they ruled the North American colonies?

What part of British rule was different for the Canadians?

461 posted on 12/05/2016 11:15:37 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

Canada was managed by the French & later the British to exploit the resources of the colony. People as settlers (Colonists) having independent prosperous lives was an after thought, a happy consequence but not policy. Royal French governments either made leaving for the New World difficult or discouraged it. The Indians were also not keen on the “new settler” idea. New France always had a low population problem.

The British colonies whether they be private or royal were also originally set up to be engines of natural resource exploitation. However it didn’t work out that way. Benign neglect and actively recruiting colonists created conditions where people became Americans. People had the opportunity to build their lives, have things they couldn’t have in the mother country. By the time England felt compelled to reassert control it was too late. The colonies had their own governments, strong local cultures/traditions & the will to do things their own way. England’s only choice was to continue the policy of “benign neglect”. England chose not to do so & the rest is history.


462 posted on 12/05/2016 11:40:56 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson