Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

If you want to be technically correct, it was not a civil war at all. A civil war is one between two parties attempting to gain control over one entity not one in which one party forces the other to not assert its independence.


140 posted on 11/23/2016 9:50:27 PM PST by electrodave1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: electrodave1
A civil war is one between two parties attempting to gain control over one entity not one in which one party forces the other to not assert its independence.

It was a rebellion.

149 posted on 11/24/2016 3:26:22 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

To: electrodave1
If you want to be technically correct, it was not a civil war at all. A civil war is one between two parties attempting to gain control over one entity not one in which one party forces the other to not assert its independence.

I agree with you, but that is the name it is most commonly known by, so I use it just to avoid having an argument over the term applied.

It is more accurately described as a War of oppression against the Independence of the Southern states.

Then as now, the Liberals try to manipulate the words to support their political agenda.

164 posted on 11/24/2016 6:35:10 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson