I didn’t say I wanted him I just said temperamentally a court appointment is the best place for him. If he is honest about restoring constitutional government.
He may not be.
Your presentation to me is the digital equivalent of piling a bunch of books and papers on my desk and claiming you solved the problem!
The unfortunate thing is the legal system has allowed the whole “eligibility issue” to be undefined to murky. You obviously don’t think so! However my opinion & your opinion on this is functionally irrelevant. Until there is a definitive ruling that all accept by a authoritative court this is a waste of time!
I am not a lawyer (You might be?) nor a court (I wager your not!) so this isn’t even interesting to me!
The settled law of the land is that the US President must be a natural born citizen, and that to be a natural born citizen, you must have been born in the United States to parents both of whom were US citizens when you were born.
You may disagree with the goal of the Constitutional Convention, and/or with the means they chose to achieve it. But it's not a technicality, not an anachronism no longer relevant in modern times, nor is it racist. Especially in modern times, it enables persons of any race or ethnic heritage to become President. And it's what the Constitution requires.
You may also disagree with binding precedent regarding the meaning of "natural born citizen" as established in Minor. But in our system, the Constitution, and the Supreme Court's interpretation of it, are the "supreme law of the land." And if one faction gets to disregard the Constitution and/or the Supreme Court because they disagree, then that sets a precedent where all other factions can do the same.