Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: kevcol

I know a lot of folks here at FR don’t like Cruz, and I doubt that Cruz even wants the gig... BUT does anyone dispute the idea that Cruz would be rock-solid constitutional conservative justice in the mold of Rehnquist/Scalia/Thomas?


19 posted on 11/11/2016 6:43:02 PM PST by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: irishjuggler

See #29


35 posted on 11/11/2016 6:48:18 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: irishjuggler

He’d be great on the court.

Always figured he could never be confirmed. But as Graham has shown, the senate would approve just to be rid of him.

Never know, maybe Trump will nominate him. Won’t have to worry about him stabbing him in the back again that way.


36 posted on 11/11/2016 6:48:25 PM PST by phoneman08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: irishjuggler

I would dispute Cruz credentials. He knows what “natural born” US citizenship is and tried to pawn himself off as a “natural born” US citizen.


39 posted on 11/11/2016 6:49:21 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: irishjuggler

Of course we dispute that a Goldman Sachs globalist drone is conservative.


47 posted on 11/11/2016 6:51:59 PM PST by MrEdd (MrEdd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: irishjuggler
BUT does anyone dispute the idea that Cruz would be rock-solid constitutional conservative justice in the mold of Rehnquist/Scalia/Thomas?

Maybe you should ask goldman sachs
48 posted on 11/11/2016 6:52:08 PM PST by JoSixChip (Cruz <- sleaze; Clinton <- criminal; Trump <- winner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: irishjuggler

What part of lifetime post don’t you understand?


66 posted on 11/11/2016 7:03:40 PM PST by Lisbon1940 (No full-term Governors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: irishjuggler

First things first. Is Cruz even on the list Trump has already drawn up ?


106 posted on 11/11/2016 7:59:22 PM PST by Islander2 (Some of us are here because we are not all there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: irishjuggler

*** BUT does anyone dispute the idea that Cruz would be rock-solid constitutional conservative justice in the mold of Rehnquist/Scalia/Thomas? ***

Yes, I dispute the idea. Cruz suicided his chances for a future in politics, except maybe with Seven Mountain Dominionists.


107 posted on 11/11/2016 8:04:58 PM PST by sockmonkey (Donald Trump will ban auto-correct with an Executive Order. Go Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: irishjuggler

I’ll dispute it. How does a rock-solid constitutional conservative imagine that a Canadian born Cuban is eligible to run for president of the United States?

If globalist Cruz can’t determine something that simple, he doesn’t need the responsibility of determining more complex cases. Besides, the CFR, Goldman Sachs and Soros don’t need another seat on the Supreme Court.


124 posted on 11/11/2016 8:21:39 PM PST by Waryone (2 Chronicles 7:14; praise God for His great mercy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: irishjuggler

I’d say doing an end run around the Constitutional requirement that a treaty has to be approved by two-thirds of the Senate pretty much removes someone from the “rock-solid constitutional conservative” category.


146 posted on 11/11/2016 9:20:17 PM PST by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: irishjuggler

I’ll take Napolitano and Cruz to replace Scalia and Ginsberg any day.


167 posted on 11/12/2016 7:54:37 AM PST by Palio di Siena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: irishjuggler
"does anyone dispute the idea that Cruz would be rock-solid constitutional conservative justice in the mold of Rehnquist/Scalia/Thomas?"

I dispute the idea.

Cruz has no understanding of The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God: The True Foundation of American Law.

170 posted on 11/12/2016 9:25:58 AM PST by Godebert (CRUZ: Born in a foreign land to a foreign father.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: irishjuggler
I know a lot of folks here at FR don’t like Cruz, and I doubt that Cruz even wants the gig... BUT does anyone dispute the idea that Cruz would be rock-solid constitutional conservative justice in the mold of Rehnquist/Scalia/Thomas?

After his Goldman-Sachs ties were uncovered... yes. I would expect him to go all David Souter/John Roberts on us.

172 posted on 11/12/2016 9:29:01 AM PST by Lazamataz (TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: irishjuggler

Steve Deace, who is friends with Cruz, said on his radio show yesterday he now thinks Cruz would want the SCOTUS position. If Trump had lost, he would’ve tried to run in 2020. But now with 2020 off the table, 8 years on the court look like they would be more productive than 8 years in the Senate.


179 posted on 11/12/2016 10:03:10 AM PST by JediJones (Social conservatism is the root of all conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson