Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: benfranklinthomasjefferson; Sheapdog

JUST SAY “NO” IN NOVEMBER – AMENDMENT 69.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3476596/posts

No on Amendment 69: ColoradoCare would be too costly.

http://www.denverpost.com/2016/04/01/no-on-amendment-69-coloradocare-would-be-too-costly/

Amendment 69 would be devastating for Colorado’s economy, employers and their employees... It would limit health care choice, access and quality.

Under Amendment 69, ALL Coloradans will lose their current benefit plan, to be replaced by benefits yet to be determined, to be serviced by an entity yet to be identified, to include providers yet to be named.

http://www.coloradansforcoloradans.com/


3 posted on 10/06/2016 1:40:04 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: george76

Here are some more useful sites with accurate information.

http://www.coloradocare.org
http://www.amendment69colorado.org
http://www.colorado69.org
http://www.faithperspectiveamendment69.org


24 posted on 10/06/2016 8:51:27 PM PDT by benfranklinthomasjefferson (that's why we need it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson