I wrote a response on the thread. I don’t think it works. This isn’t a dead candidate AFTER an election. This would be replacing someone in the MIDDLE of an election, after votes had been counted.
Just one singe person could bring a successful suit saying, “No, I didn’t vote for the D ‘electors,’ I voted for Cankles.” And he’d have a point.
It seems like it’s new territory, and in a lawless time, that’s not good.
“Just one singe person could bring a successful suit saying, “No, I didn’t vote for the D ‘electors,’ I voted for Cankles.” And he’d have a point.”
As I recall, ballots here (AZ) state that the vote is, in fact, for a slate of electors. Therefore, such a case would be thrown out instantly.