Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins; LS

I tend to think of signs as being evidence of intensity of support, not necessarily breadth of support. More signs means people who are really excited about their candidate, but not necessarily more people supporting that candidate.

That being said, I still think Trump is winning right now. IIRC, the last Ohio poll had him up by 3%, and I can’t see any reason to think that’s not legitimate.


9 posted on 09/06/2016 6:35:07 AM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (You can't have a constitution without a country to go with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Yashcheritsiy

I definitely agree with you on that. Yard signs aren’t a scientific polling of balanced demographics. The one caveat I’d throw in there is that I went through the richest neighborhoods (Indian Hills, Cincinnati), and the poorest (Adams County). The absence of Clinton signs is striking.

If there’s no intensity at all across a range of neighborhoods for Clinton, then that doesn’t speak well for the vigor of her supporters. Maybe they’re all out having coughing fits.


12 posted on 09/06/2016 6:40:33 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson