“A 1000-yard shot on a game animal seems highly unethical regardless of accuracy claims.”
Which instinctively raises the question, at what distance do you find the line that divides between ethical and unethical?
AND, the even more important question: WHO DECIDES?
Hmmmmmmmmm????????????
When I'm hunting, I decide.
An ethical sportsman should know if he is able to run 1000+ yards to overcome and dispatch a wounded game animal which is basically what's going to end up happening.