Posted on 08/14/2016 9:47:48 PM PDT by Regurgitated
Bkmrk.
No one can point to the fbi claim on a date before the sorcha faal story. Then everyone ran with it including so many from fr.
Saw where Seth’s dad said seth was going to go work for clinton in an Interview.seth had connections to the kleeps who were sanders supporters
Btw..since you were victim of faal...what is your assessment of motive and who pays for his antics.
Is he a disinformation specialist or a nutcase hoaxer?.
Probably none.
The telling piece of the mystery is that the FBI and the Brown Shirt Media are completely uninterested. Imagine poor old Seth worked for the GOP but was a “mole” for the Rats. The BSM and FBI would be all over this 24/7.
Since people here keep falling for sorcha faal..they would be better of trying to get to the bottom of who or what he is..
.david booth...Rachel booth...j forrest Sharpe.?????..etc
Two related points really stick out **
1. Julian Assange was pretty upset over the death of this high level DNC staffer (likely informant), who had been strategically involved in the organizing the DNC election process.
2. The official report stated Seth had been shot TWICE in the back. However, it also reported or suggested he had been beaten as well, as “bruises” covered his body.
The above reporting does indicate “shots” (plural) were fired. As I recall, according to the police report Seth Rich was shot twice in the back. These stories give.
However, the same report also stated there were no witnesses.
If there was a fight where Seth Rich was beaten but mot robbed, the robbery narrative almost has to be false. And, even though early in the morning, how were there no witnesses, especially after at least two gun shots?
I guess there could have been a suppressor used, but it was almost assuredly not a robbery. This seems to be an intentional false narrative.
Hmmmmm.....
The police report itself does not seem right.
And they seemed to chalk it up to a robbery gone bad!
There is almost no way there is not more to Seth Rich’s execution!
If he was shot twice in the back, this was a hit.
The questions must then come back to who was behind it, and why (motive).
The answer going to motive may well be in front of us. Connecting the dots is the problem. Especially if it involves high level authorities and cover up.
“What is your assessment of motive”
Case in point:
My unique studies, on earth related seismic phenomenon, “booming sounds”, were presented as proof (in Sorcha’s story) for a connection in events that led to a conclusion the story wanted to achieve.
Thus the story had huge holes in actual proof. Instead of writing the story with a question to a possible association or explanation, the story(stories) were written as “proof” to a conclusion.
When a story has events that have “possible associations” or links to the overall event, this needs to be stated. A “possibility” tree thus develops as branches in the ultimate conclusion. Therefore a reader would be able to assess the probability of the solidness of the conclusion.
But, if it is inferred to be “matter-of-fact”, without revealing the uncertainties (or possibilities), the writer can lead a person along as if it looks like good research to a final conclusion.
Only big time investigative reporting can drive to final conclusions as their stories research each link along the story path. This takes time, money, investigative journalist expertise of the subject(s) at hand, and sometimes lucky insider source tips.
As to the funding of Sorcha, I do not have any information to answer.
All excellent points.
Another point is the killers did not take his phone. That means police have it. Lots of info on it, no doubt.
They didn’t take his phone and they didn’t take his wallet, nor any cash that was in it. This would rule out a robbery gone awry pretty quickly. If robbery was the motive, even if they shot and killed him, they would have taken his valuables.
No, this was a hit.
Well, that’s what I mean. Blocks from his home in a city is a lot further than in front of his home as the newbie blog claims. Another point, Seth was shot at 4:18am, not 4:20 (a psyops “hook” which would appeal to basement dweller stoners). This from the father, and from the girlfriend on the phone at the time of the gunshots and matches the police log response time of 4:19. Lastly, this story turned up on another conspiracy site back in mid-July. So how is any of this, new, news? or, for that matter, news at all?
A newbie with a conspiracy theory off a newbie blog quoting more newbie blogs? yeah, I’ll pass. Sounds to me more like Seth was a victim of a polar bear hunt from a passing vehicle, hence no robbery.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3459332/posts
Thanks. I’ll have a look at sorcha faal.
It should be a top story. The silence implies something devious.
bump
“but it was almost assuredly not a robbery.”
I think it was the Seth Rich story (although I may have it confused with another Clinton murder), but IIRC, he had a lot on him that thieves would take, but didn’t. Nothing was missing.
placemark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.