Posted on 08/02/2016 8:50:36 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
No, really, she is.
It feels like everyone has been hacked by foreign operatives lately. Hillary’s campaign got hacked, the DNC got hacked, and hackers are regularly targeting the Pentagon as well as other arms of the federal machine. Even big corporations like Sony pictures are being hacked.
So, on Friday, Donald Trump was discussing the idea that maybe, just maybe, we should look into some non-hackable security for military communications.
That’s not a radical notion, right? As he put it:
“we should look into some non-hackable security”
There’s no such thing. If humans design it, other humans can find a way in.
‘Effin ad soaked site.
Russia, Israel, North Korea and a dozen other nations spend billions of dollars and their best brains to access foreign communications. If some guy in his undershorts living in his mother’s basement can access this stuff, tell me why the foreign intel services do not have every one of Hillary’s emails. If this is so we can probably trace several deaths to her carelessness.
Of course they all hacked her server. Which makes it even stupider of her to delete all those emails. We can’t even be sure of what was compromised now thanks to her conspiracy to destroy the evidence.
Looks like Mr Khan worked for firm that helped set up Hillary’s leaky basement email server and is involved in a corruption riddled business of importing (selling citizenship to) radicals that are a direct threat to US national security
I wonder if he - or Hillary- accepted bribes to help the guys who killed his son?
Clinton- always a scandal
Powerful 7 minute video
Needs to go viral
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9jNDWxXdqg
The Russians do it all the time. Yt’s called one time cyphers.
Those aren’t invincible either, and I don’t think they are practical for computer security, since transmitting the keys over the web would be a huge vulnerability.
That is an awesome headline.
Oh I’m not referring to one time cypher pads for computers. I remember a spy in one of the Le Carre books using a novel as a key pad to send and receive messages. Using the same system even through computers is very difficult or near impossible to decipher. For example using “Catcher in the Rye” as the one time cipher pad, then changing to Rebecca the next time.
“For example using “Catcher in the Rye” as the one time cipher pad, then changing to Rebecca the next time.”
And how exactly is the computer at the other end going to know what the new pad is? You’ve got to transmit that information, even if you are not transmitting the key.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.