Posted on 07/26/2016 2:15:46 PM PDT by Sopater
Friday's grand opening of U.S. Bank Stadium, the $1.1 billion new home of the National Football League's Minnesota Vikings, was marred by a bit of vandalism. The façade of the new stadium was damaged last week when a vandal tossed a rock through one of the hundreds of glass panels that cover every inch of the stadium's exterior.
The result: a hole big enough for a small human to crawl through, according to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. The 10-foot-by-five-foot exterior glass panel was smashed, though an interior panel did not break.
The newspaper said stadium security suspect the rock responsible for the damage was part of a "pile of decorative rock" located adjacent to the stadium's north side.
You have to wonder about the wisdom of leaving "piles of decorative rock" next to billion-dollar rendition of a Jawa sandcrawler covered in glass. It makes a very inviting target if you find it pleasant to break something from time to time, or if you're frustrated by the expense of the publicly funded stadium and want to make Austrian economic parables come to life.
That's because U.S. Bank Stadium, like many of today's taxpayer-funded professional playgrounds, is itself a giant testament to the enduring power of the broken windows fallacy.
Minnesota taxpayers fronted $348 million for the stadium, thanks to legislation signed in 2012 by Gov. Mark Dayton. The same bill required Minneapolis to fund an additional $150 million for the stadium, which the city did by increasing hospitality taxes.
Like the broken window in Bastiat's parable—which points out that economic activity redirected from one "unseen" purpose to another "seen" one, as in when a broken window is repeaired, does not produce a net positive in economic activity—new stadiums don't generate new economic activity, they merely redirect it.
In other words: What could have been done with those millions of dollars had they remained in the hands of Minnesota families and businesses? We'll never know.
But we do know that the stadium is unlikely to generate net economic benefits for the Twin Cities.
"Sports facilities attract neither tourists nor new industry," concluded economists Andrew Zimbalist and Roger G. Noll at the Brookings Institute in a report published nearly two decades ago, as cities across the country were embarking on a stadium-building binge. "A new sports facility has an extremely small (perhaps even negative) effect on overall economic activity and employment."
At the end of the 2010 season, the average public bill for the 121 professional sports stadiums in the United States was $259 million, according to research from the University of Michigan. The same study found that taxpayers lost $31 billion in net economic costs for stadium construction.
A 2012 analysis by Bloomberg found that taxpayers were on the hook for more than $4 billion in bond payments for professional sports stadiums built since 1996.
Yet local governments keep committing big bucks to stadium projects.
In Hartford, Connecticut, local officials have blown through $63 million on a publicly financed stadium and still don't have anything to show for it. In Cobb County, Georgia, county officials had to raise taxes to keep public parks open after spending $400 million on a new stadium for baseball's Atlanta Braves.
The list goes on and on. And on.
Incredibly, the Vikings say it will take up to two months to replace the damaged window at U.S Bank Stadium, since all the glass panels were custom-made. There's no word on how much those massive, custom-made glass panels will cost to replace, but they probably won't be cheap.
Just add that to the tab. Taxpayers in Minnesota are already paying for $16 million in cost overruns (though the Vikings have generously offered to cover $4 million worth) at U.S. Bank Stadium.
At least the glaziers will have work.
The Braves never needed a new stadium. Turner Field was a good enough replacement for Fulton County Stadium, but nooooo. Might as well change the name to The Smyrna Braves.
Bookmark for later
Of course, some vandals are so miserable unhappy that they would put graffiti on churches or synagogues just to show the world how miserable they are. They can't be stopped.
I read somewhere that the bulk of graffiti spoilers are daddy-less boys. All children have a "father," but not all have a "dad."
The vandal apologized for his actions so all is well.
Yeah, and he might have seen some reflection in the glass that offended him, so he felt that he had a right to break it.
I am extremely glad the Braves gave Kasim Reed the middle finger and moved.
How many sports franchises left Atlanta under his rule?
BTW, I live in Gwinnett county and got screwed with our stadium.
The Braves never needed a new stadium. Turner Field was a good enough replacement for Fulton County Stadium, but nooooo. Might as well change the name to The Smyrna Braves.
The Braves moved to escape Atlanta politics and to improve the fan drive/ experience/safety.
Please give me the source for unbreakable, non scratch plastic. I’ve never seen such a material but I could sure use some!
Or they can be called “the Fulton County tax and corruption free Braves”
The Braves should have paid for it themselves.
I’m so glad that I live in a state that doesn’t have any professional sports tems that we’d get stuck financing with taxpayer money!
This whole nonsense of government paying for private sports stadiums needs to be banned. It’s just a way for (mostly) Democrats to channel taxpayer funds to the pockets of their political cronies.
Unbreakable...but not non-scratch. It sure would be better than WALLS of broken glass from the stadium, wouldn't it?
Polycarbonate is damned near unbreakable but it’s softer than acrylic so it scratches more easily.
Probably Chinese glaziers. They did the windows for the 9/11 memorial in NY. Paying for these ugly and expensive monuments to banking and skulduggery is just another choice we’re not qualified to make about who gets to put their hands in the honey pot that is our lives.
I "googled" it--very interesting.
Thanks.
Let them pay for their own stadiums. If the team can’t generate enough wealth to pay for their own infrastructure, they certainly can’t generate enough wealth for anyone else to shoulder the expense.
My primary interest is for display cases and other exhibit related uses. Acrylic is a very good material but it attracts dust and lint like mad due to static electricity and it scratches easily.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.