Posted on 07/09/2016 6:27:58 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Megyn Kelly seems to love poking Donald Trump with a stick despite having trotted an olive branch into Trump Towers not too long ago.
Megyn Kelly of Fox News got a bit "snarky" when reporting on Ted Cruz accepting Donald Trump's invitation to speak at the Republican Convention during her show this week. Kelly seems to up the ante with her criticism if it has anything to do with Donald Trump. Despite her very public trek with an olive branch over to Trump Towers a while back, she still seems to harbor some animosity when it comes to the GOP candidate. It looks as though Kelly's attempt to show she's made peace with Donald Trump after the debacle around the Fox News hosted Republican debate, was just that... a show.
Megyn Kelly vs. Donald Trump continued.
Kelly seemed to have Trump in her scopes from the get-go of his campaign when she appeared to have her own agenda when questioning Trump at that debate. Trump never backed down and he later shut Kelly out by refusing to attend the next debate she was slated to moderate. It is hard to believe that Kelly's peace-making mission via the trip to Trump Towers that day was something she initiated. Chances are the real scoop on how that all materialized will probably stay under wraps until the day comes when she follows one of her many colleagues out the Fox News door, like Gretchen Carlson, Andrea Tantaros or Alisyn Camerota....
(Excerpt) Read more at us.blastingnews.com ...
Cruz never trashed Mrs. Trump, an unaffiliated Super PAC did.
***
Oh yes, using a picture procured by Jeff Roe. The ad started in the Cruz campaign; he bears the responsibility for it even if he didn’t know what Roe was doing, because he hired the man.
A good man can still be swayed by pressure and bad advice into doing things that he would not otherwise do. A good man can still make mistakes or be vindictive or be nasty in moments of weakness.
You can still support Mr. Cruz without having to defend everything he does.
Proof of Roe’s involvement?
You didn’t read any more than the first line of my response, did you?
Translation: I have no proof.
I thought Roe owned up to that mess?
Link?
I’ll be happy, just can’t right now, but I assure you 2nd, when I have time later I will find the link.
Did you even read my response?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3413941/posts
http://prntly.com/2016/03/25/breaking-jeff-roe-cruz-adviser-may-have-greenlit-melania-ad-to-pac-admits-driving-man-to-suicide/
There. Evidence. And about as strong of evidence as was thrown at Trump and expected to be believed without question.
Now read my first response again. I’m trying to be conciliatory. I’m trying to be kind without being a kiss-ass. And the response is to be snarky and pissy.
Did you even read what I had to say?
Did you?
Prntly was founded in 2014 by Alex Portelli, a former libertarian candidate for Mayor, and now political activist. He has been involved with many aspects of the conservative movement, and has recently endorsed Donald Trump. As the blog section of Prntly expanded, the print side of the company took second stage, but was still providing help to candidates like Ben Carson in New Hampshire through beautiful printing supplies.
(If interested, please mail us @ mail@prntly.com)
Good for them then.
Doesn’t disprove anything they said.
But, you know, you CAN say that Cruz did something wrong without having to denounce him or call him the devil. You can admit that he’s a poor miserable sinner like all of us are.
I mean, what’s the worst that can happen if it turns out that Cruz was the first one who attacked Trump’s wife? He’s knocked off a pedestal that many of his followers seem to have placed him on. Whoopee. So freaking what?
Because the way you’re talking sounds to me like you’re getting the passion out of defending your own self image more than Cruz at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.